Page 26 of 27
Fansheretal. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2025) 10:7
Fagerlin, A., Wang, C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). Reducing the influence of anecdotal
reasoning on people’s health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thou-
sand statistics? Medical Decision Making, 25(4), 398–405. https:// doi. org/
10. 1177/ 02729 89X05 278931
Fansher, M., Adkins, T. J., Lalwani, P., Boduroglu, A., Carlson, M., Quirk, M., Lewis,
R. L., Shah, P., Zhang, H., & Jonides, J. (2022b). Icon arrays reduce concern
over COVID-19 vaccine side effects: A randomized control study. Cogni-
tive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 38. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/
s41235- 022- 00387-5
Fansher, M., Adkins, T. J., Lewis, R. L., Boduroglu, A., Lalwani, P., Quirk, M., Shah,
P., & Jonides, J. (2022a). How well do ordinary Americans forecast the
growth of COVID-19? Memory & Cognition, 50(7), 1363–1380. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 3758/ s13421- 022- 01288-0
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2024). Ethical interaction theory. In Diversity and disa-
greement: From fundamental biases to ethical interactions (pp. 211–246).
Springer Nature Switzerland.
Franconeri, S. L., Padilla, L. M., Shah, P., Zacks, J. M., & Hullman, J. (2021). The
science of visual data communication: What works. Psychological Science
in the Public Interest, 22(3), 110–161. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 15291 00621
10519 56
Freling, T. H., Yang, Z., Saini, R., Itani, O. S., & Abualsamh, R. R. (2020). When
poignant stories outweigh cold hard facts: A meta-analysis of the anec-
dotal bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160,
51–67. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2020. 01. 006
Galesic, M., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2011). Graph literacy: A cross-cultural com-
parison. Medical Decision Making, 31(3), 444–457. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/
02729 89x10 373805
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2014). Using visual aids to help people with
low numeracy make better decisions. In Numerical reasoning in judgments
and decision making about health (pp. 153–174). Cambridge University
Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ CBO97 81139 644358. 008
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2017). Designing visual aids that promote
risk literacy: A systematic review of health research and evidence-based
design heuristics. Human Factors, 59(4), 582–627. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/
00187 20817 690634
Garcia-Retamero, R., Okan, Y., & Cokely, E. T. (2012). Using visual aids to improve
communication of risks about health: A review. The Scientific World Jour-
nal, 2012(1), 562637. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1100/ 2012/ 562637
Grice, J. W., Medellin, E., Jones, I., Horvath, S., McDaniel, H., O’lansen, C., & Baker,
M. (2020). Persons as effect sizes. Advances in Methods and Practices in
Psychological Science, 3(4), 443–455. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 25152 45920
922982
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020). A review of the effects of uncertainty in
public science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6),
614–633. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09636 62520 942122
Han, W., & Schulz, H. J. (2020, October). Beyond trust building—Calibrating
trust in visual analytics. In 2020 IEEE workshop on trust and expertise in
visual analytics (TREX) (pp. 9–15). IEEE. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TREX5 1495.
2020. 00006
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional pro-
cess analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult
questions. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 343–351. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1016/j. learn instr uc. 2004. 06. 007
Herring, J., VanDyke, M. S., Cummins, R. G., & Melton, F. (2017). Communicat-
ing local climate risks online through an interactive data visualization.
Environmental Communication, 11(1), 90–105. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/
17524 032. 2016. 11769 46
Hullman, J. (2019). Why authors don’t visualize uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on
Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1), 130–139. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1109/ TVCG. 2019. 29342 87
Hullman, J., & Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects
in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer
Graphics, 17(12), 2231–2240. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ TVCG. 2011. 255
Hullman, J., Drucker, S., Riche, N. H., Lee, B., Fisher, D., & Adar, E. (2013). A deeper
understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on
Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2406–2415. https:// doi. org/
10. 1109/ TVCG. 2013. 119
Janssen, E., van Osch, L., de Vries, H., & Lechner, L. (2013). The influence of
narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk. British Journal of
Health Psychology, 18(2), 407–419. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 2044- 8287.
2012. 02098.x
Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2008). Trust in digital informa-
tion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technol-
ogy, 59(3), 363–374. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ asi. 20722
Kerr, J., van der Bles, A. M., Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Chopurian, V., Freeman,
A. L., & Van Der Linden, S. (2023). The effects of communicating uncer-
tainty around statistics, on public trust. Royal Society Open Science, 10(11),
230604. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rsos. 230604
Kim, Y. S., Reinecke, K., & Hullman, J. (2017). Explaining the gap: Visualizing one’s
predictions improves recall and comprehension of data. In Proceedings
of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp.
1375–1386). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 30254 53. 30255 92
Koerth, M., & Elena, M. (2020). Why even a small thanksgiving is dangerous.
FiveThirtyEight.
Kong, H. K., Liu, Z., & Karahalios, K. (2019). Trust and recall of information across
varying degrees of title-visualization misalignment. In Proceedings of the
2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13).
Lammers, J., Crusius, J., & Gast, A. (2020). Correcting misperceptions of
exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(28), 16264–16266.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 20060 48117
Lee, C., Yang, T., Inchoco, G. D., Jones, G. M., & Satyanarayan, A. (2021). Viral
visualizations: How coronavirus skeptics use orthodox data practices to
promote unorthodox science online. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI confer-
ence on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–18). https:// doi. org/ 10.
1145/ 34117 64. 34452 11
Levine, A. J., Hernandez, M., & Spring, J. (2021). Vanishing tropical rainforests.
https:// graph ics. reute rs. com/ GLOBAL- DEFOR ESTAT ION/ RAINF OREST/
klvyk zrbxvg/
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misin-
formation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debias-
ing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1177/ 15291 00612 451018
Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal
trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and
future directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1177/ 01492 06306 294405
Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., & Seydali, R. (2014). The effects of learners’ differences on
variable manipulation behaviors in simulation-based learning. Journal of
Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 13–34. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2190/ ET.
43.1.c
Lipkus, I. M., & Hollands, J. G. (1999). The visual communication of risk. JNCI
Monographs, 1999(25), 149–163. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ oxfor djour nals.
jncim onogr aphs. a0241 91
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude
polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evi-
dence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098. https://
doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022- 3514. 37. 11. 2098
Magana, A. J., & Silva Coutinho, G. (2017). Modeling and simulation practices
for a computational thinking-enabled engineering workforce. Computer
Applications in Engineering Education, 25(1), 62–78. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1002/ cae. 21779
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge
Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 41, 31–48.
Mayr, E., Hynek, N., Salisu, S., & Windhager, F. (2019). Trust in Information Visuali-
zation. In TrustVis@ EuroVis (pp. 25–29).
McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and
expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
6(3), 467–472. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67280 63023
McNaughton, C. D., Cavanaugh, K. L., Kripalani, S., Rothman, R. L., & Wallston, K.
A. (2015). Validation of a short, 3-item version of the subjective numeracy
scale. Medical Decision Making, 35(8), 932–936. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/
02729 89X15 581800
Newell, R., Dale, A., & Winters, C. (2016). A picture is worth a thousand data
points: Exploring visualizations as tools for connecting the public to
climate change research. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1201885. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1080/ 23311 886. 2016. 12018 85
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). Displacing misinformation about events: An
experimental test of causal corrections. Journal of Experimental Political